Identifying and Analyzing the Key Drivers and challenges of Environmental and Socio-Economic Externalities Caused by Municipal Solid Waste Management in Delhi

Abstract

Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) management is one of the most serious urban problems in Delhi, where intense population growth, urbanization, and shifting patterns of consumption have largely exceeded the city\'s waste managing capacity. The study seeks to determine and examine the major drivers and challenges pertaining to the environmental and socio-economic externalities arising from poor MSW management in Delhi. Through an analysis of a variety of factors—such as poor waste segregation at source, excessive dependence on landfills, poor institutional coordination, and the informal waste sector\'s marginalized position—this research gives a complete picture of the systemic problems behind waste-related externalities. Environmental effects like groundwater pollution, air pollution, and greenhouse gas emissions are evaluated together with socio-economic impacts like public health hazards, livelihood insecurity for informal workers, and spatial disparities. The study uses a mixed-methods design, including field surveys, stakeholder interviews, and spatial data analysis to construct a holistic framework of waste management dynamics. The results emphasize the imperative necessity for integrated policy reforms, improved community engagement, and scalable infrastructure solutions to avert the cascading impacts of suboptimal MSW practices. This research adds to the general debate on sustainable urban development by providing practical recommendations to policymakers, waste management agencies, and civil society organizations

Introduction

1. Overview
Rapid urbanization and population growth in Delhi have intensified the challenges of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) management. Delhi generates over 11,000 metric tons of waste daily, straining its waste management infrastructure. Inadequate segregation, weak governance, policy loopholes, and an under-supported informal sector have led to severe environmental, public health, and socio-economic externalities.

2. Key Externalities

• Environmental Degradation
  Open dumping and landfill overuse result in air, water, and soil pollution. Methane emissions from landfills contribute significantly to climate change, while leachate contaminates groundwater.

• Public Health Risks
  Exposure to pollutants causes respiratory diseases, infections, and mental health issues, especially in communities near landfill sites and among informal waste workers.

• Economic Costs
  Waste mismanagement incurs high costs in healthcare, environmental clean-up, infrastructure damage, and loss of tourism revenue.

• Social Inequities
  Marginalized communities, including informal waste workers, face exploitation, health risks, and forced displacement, deepening urban inequality.

• Ecological and Climate Impact
  Improper waste management affects biodiversity, degrades natural ecosystems, and accelerates climate change through greenhouse gas emissions.

3. Drivers Behind the Externalities

• Governance and Institutional Failures
  Fragmented responsibilities, poor enforcement of the 2016 Solid Waste Management Rules, and limited budgetary support hinder effective MSW management.

• Behavioral and Socioeconomic Factors
  Low public awareness, insufficient incentives, and uneven education levels affect participation in waste segregation and recycling.

• Informal Sector Exclusion
  While playing a major role in waste recovery, informal workers lack formal recognition, social protection, and safe working conditions.

• Technological Gaps
  Advanced waste treatment technologies like composting and waste-to-energy are underused or poorly maintained.

4. Impacts by Sector

5. Research Contribution
The study identifies the systemic causes of MSW externalities in Delhi and emphasizes integrated, sustainable, and inclusive strategies for improvement. It calls for stronger governance, public participation, technological innovation, and policy reform to build a resilient urban waste system.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the management of municipal solid waste (MSW) in Delhi presents a complexandmultifacetedchallenge,with significant environmental,socio-economic,andpublichealthimplications.Theexternalitiesgeneratedbyimproperwastemanagementpracticesunderscoretheurgentneedforcomprehensiveandsustainablesolutionstoaddresstherootcausesoftheseissues. From this study on MSW-related externalities drivers, it is evident that population increase, urbanization, inadequate infrastructure, policy loopholes, and informal waste sector dynamics are some of the key drivers. These drivers interact in intricate ways, aggravating environmental pollution, public health risks, economic costs, and social inequalities in the city. It is important that stakeholders such as policymakers, urban planners, entrepreneurs, civil society groups, and citizens convene in a combined effort to address MSW-related externalities. By cooperating with each other and sharing experience and resources, Delhi can overcome the issues of municipal solid waste and pave the way for a clean, healthy, and sustainable future. At last, sustainable waste management is not just a requirement for Delhi\'s environmental and socio-economic health but also an ethical imperative for the present and future generations. Let us take this chance to create a city where waste is reduced, resources are cherished, and the health of all citizens is given top priority.

References

[1] Alvarez-Sousa, A. (2018). The problems of tourist sustainability in cultural cities: Socio-political perceptions and interests management. Sustainability, 10(2), 503. [2] Ahmed, G., Anawar, H. M., Takuwa, D. T., Chibua, I. T., Singh, G. S., &Sichilongo, K. (2015). Environmental assessment of fate, transport and persistent behavior of dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethanes and hexachlorocyclohexanes in land and water ecosystems. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 12, 2741-2756. [3] Aparcana, S. (2017). Approaches to formalization of the informal waste sector into municipal solid waste management systems in low-and middle-income countries: Review of barriers and success factors. Waste management, 61, 593-607. [4] Ayanbimpe, G. M., Danjuma, W. S., &Okolo, M. O. (2012). Relationship between fungal contamination of indoor air and health problems of some residents in Jos (Vol. 2012, pp. 1-20). London, England: IntechOpen. [5] Baron, S. L., Beard, S., Davis, L. K., Delp, L., Forst, L., Kidd?Taylor, A., ...& Welch, L. S. (2014). Promoting integrated approaches to reducing health inequities among low?income workers: Applying a social ecological framework. American journal of industrial medicine, 57(5), 539-556. [6] Brender, J. D., Maantay, J. A., &Chakraborty, J. (2011). Residential proximity to environmental hazards and adverse health outcomes. American journal of public health, 101(S1), S37-S52. [7] Breukelman, H., Krikke, H., &Löhr, A. (2019). Failing services on urban waste management in developing countries: A review on symptoms, diagnoses, and interventions. Sustainability, 11(24), 6977. [8] CentralPollutionControlBoard(CPCB).(2019).AnnualReportonImplementationofSolidWasteManagementRules(SWM), 2016in Delhi. [9] Chala, B., &Hamde, F. (2021). Emerging and re-emerging vector-borne infectious diseases and the challenges for control: a review. Frontiers in public health, 9, 715759. [10] Chaturvedi, B., &Gidwani, V. (2010). The right to waste: Informal sector recyclers and struggles for social justice in post-reform urban India. In India\'s New Economic Policy (pp. 137-165). Routledge. [11] Das, A. (2018). Assessing the environmental impacts of municipal solid waste managementinDelhi. EnvironmentalScienceandPollution Research,25(28), 28290-28301. [12] Gautam, M., &Agrawal, M. (2020). Greenhouse gas emissions from municipal solid waste management: a review of global scenario. Carbon footprint case studies: municipal solid waste management, sustainable road transport and carbon sequestration, 123-160. [13] Gupta, D. K., Bhatia, A., Kumar, A., Das, T. K., Jain, N., Tomer, R., ...&Pathak, H. (2016). Mitigation of greenhouse gas emission from rice–wheat system of the Indo-Gangetic plains: Through tillage, irrigation and fertilizer management. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 230, 1-9. [14] Helbling, T. (2010). What are externalities. Finance & development, 47(4), 48-49. [15] Jardosh, N., &Kathuria, V. (2025). Social cost–-benefit analysis of solid waste management options with application to Mumbai, India. Waste Management & Research, 43(1), 39-49. [16] Kala, K., &Bolia, N. B. (2024). Empowering the informal sector in urban waste management: Towards a comprehensive waste management policy for India. Environmental Development, 49, 100968. [17] Kolawole, A. S., &Iyiola, A. O. (2023). Environmental pollution: threats, impact on biodiversity, and protection strategies. In Sustainable utilization and conservation of Africa’s biological resources and environment (pp. 377-409). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. [18] Krieger, N. (2010). Workers are people too: societal aspects of occupational health disparities—an ecosocial perspective. American journal of industrial medicine, 53(2), 104-115. [19] Kumar, P., & Bhattacharyya, J. K. (2020). Municipal solid waste management in Delhi:currentpractices,gapsandchallenges.InternationalJournalofSustainableBuiltEnvironment,9, 117-134. [20] Ligsay, A., Telle, O., & Paul, R. (2021). Challenges to mitigating the urban health burden of mosquito-borne diseases in the face of climate change. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(9), 5035. [21] Libecap, G. D. (2014). Addressing global environmental externalities: Transaction costs considerations. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(2), 424-479. [22] Mahmood, S., Sharif, F., Rahman, A. U., & Khan, A. U. (2018). Analysis and forecasting of municipal solid waste in Nankana City using geo-spatial techniques. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 190, 1-14. [23] Mazhandu, Z. S., Muzenda, E., Mamvura, T. A., Belaid, M., &Nhubu, T. (2020). Integrated and consolidated review of plastic waste management and bio-based biodegradable plastics: Challenges and opportunities. Sustainability, 12(20), 8360. [24] Massarutto, A. (2015). Economic aspects of thermal treatment of solid waste in a sustainable WM system. Waste Management, 37, 45-57. [25] Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, Government of India. (2020). SwachhSurvekshan2020:Rankings. [26] Mor, S., &Ravindra, K. (2023). Municipal solid waste landfills in lower-and middle-income countries: Environmental impacts, challenges and sustainable management practices. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 174, 510-530. [27] Priyadarshanee, M., Mahto, U., & Das, S. (2022). Mechanism of toxicity and adverse health effects of environmental pollutants. In Microbial biodegradation and bioremediation (pp. 33-53). Elsevier. [28] Singh, R. P., Tyagi, V. V., Allen, T., Ibrahim, M. H., & Kothari, R. (2011). An overview for exploring the possibilities of energy generation from municipal solid waste (MSW) in Indian scenario. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(9), 4797-4808. [29] Sengupta,A.,&Das,M.(2017).MunicipalsolidwastemanagementinDelhi:currentstatusandfutureoutlook. CurrentScience, 113(11), 2129-2134. [30] United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2018). Waste management in Delhi:currentscenario and potentialsolutions. [31] Wakefield, S., & Elliott, S. J. (2000). Environmental risk perception and well-being: effects of the landfill siting process in two southern Ontario communities. Social science & medicine, 50(7-8), 1139-1154.

Copyright

Copyright © 2025 Dhruv Singh, Dhanish Singh, Dr. Mahima Shukla. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.